<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Canon EF 70-200 mm F4L USM &amp; Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens, two of my other &#8216;children&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timsdd.com/my-canon-ef-70-200-mm-f4l-usm-canon-ef-24-105mm-f4-l-is-usm-lens-two-of-my-other-children/227/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timsdd.com/my-canon-ef-70-200-mm-f4l-usm-canon-ef-24-105mm-f4-l-is-usm-lens-two-of-my-other-children/227</link>
	<description>Photography, Time-Lapse Video, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:54:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: timsdd</title>
		<link>http://www.timsdd.com/my-canon-ef-70-200-mm-f4l-usm-canon-ef-24-105mm-f4-l-is-usm-lens-two-of-my-other-children/227/comment-page-1#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>timsdd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timsdd.com/?p=227#comment-667</guid>
		<description>Thanks Andy. Yeah the 2.8 is MAX sexy but like I said and you know yourself, you just don&#039;t use the 70-200 very much in proportion to a mid zoom say. 
Yep, hard to pass up the 24-105/4/IS if I would have bought that one first no telling if I would have even considered all the others I have. Wait, who am I kidding :p

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;timsdds last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timsdd.com/my-canon-ef-70-200-mm-f4l-usm-canon-ef-24-105mm-f4-l-is-usm-lens-two-of-my-other-children/227&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My Canon EF 70-200 mm F4L USM &amp; Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens, two of my other ‘children’&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Andy. Yeah the 2.8 is MAX sexy but like I said and you know yourself, you just don&#8217;t use the 70-200 very much in proportion to a mid zoom say.<br />
Yep, hard to pass up the 24-105/4/IS if I would have bought that one first no telling if I would have even considered all the others I have. Wait, who am I kidding :p</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>timsdds last blog post..<a href="http://www.timsdd.com/my-canon-ef-70-200-mm-f4l-usm-canon-ef-24-105mm-f4-l-is-usm-lens-two-of-my-other-children/227" rel="nofollow">My Canon EF 70-200 mm F4L USM &amp; Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens, two of my other ‘children’</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.timsdd.com/my-canon-ef-70-200-mm-f4l-usm-canon-ef-24-105mm-f4-l-is-usm-lens-two-of-my-other-children/227/comment-page-1#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timsdd.com/?p=227#comment-666</guid>
		<description>Those lenses are the shizznits! Could you imagine the sizze of the lens had they made it a 2.8 though? I want that 24-105. What a range and IS to boot!

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Andys last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://atgphotos.com/gallery/6642798_39FEu&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Macro&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those lenses are the shizznits! Could you imagine the sizze of the lens had they made it a 2.8 though? I want that 24-105. What a range and IS to boot!</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>Andys last blog post..<a href="http://atgphotos.com/gallery/6642798_39FEu" rel="nofollow">Macro</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.936 seconds -->

