Moving on to the big gun, my Canon EF 70-200 mm F4L USM lens. They make a version that has IS (Image Stabilization) but anytime a lens has that feature tack on an additional $500 @ least.

Of course the coveted lenses are the 70-200/2.8 but those are twice as expensive and truly, I do not use this focal length often enough to warrant the additional expenditure. However, the 2.8 would be far more helpful to those that shoot sports for instance, of which I rarely do.

The lens is fast, great images and the most economical L lens that Canon offers TMK (To My Knowledge). Plus it looks impressive too :-)

Canon EF 70-200mm F4L USM

Canon EF 70-200mm F4L USM Canon EF 70-200mm F4L USM

Canon EF 70-200mm F4L USM

Canon EF 70-200mm F4L USM

»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

Ok, this one definitely falls under the category of being “my precious”

This is my Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens. It is far and away my most versatile and therefore most used lens. Not only does it go from wide angle to a decent mid zoom but it’s also F4, a L lens, AND it has IS (Image Stabilization)….win/win/win/win. Not surprisingly it is also my most expensive lens or maybe a close 2nd to my Tilt/Shift.

In any case, I use this about 88.4% of the time, unless of course I’m doing macro shots. The only ‘drawback’ that I see with it is that it’s not 2.8. So while it does have IS (making it possible to achieve slower shutter speeds akin to a 2.8 lens), the DOF does not drop off as fast as a 2.8 lens would. While that may not seem like much, it can make a difference in a shot in my experience.

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM

Rate this:
2.8
  • Share/Bookmark

2 Responses to “My Canon EF 70-200 mm F4L USM & Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens, two of my other ‘children’”

  1. no imageAndy (Check me out!) Says:

    Those lenses are the shizznits! Could you imagine the sizze of the lens had they made it a 2.8 though? I want that 24-105. What a range and IS to boot!

    Andys last blog post..Macro

    Rate this:
    2.2
  2. no imagetimsdd (Check me out!) Says:

    Thanks Andy. Yeah the 2.8 is MAX sexy but like I said and you know yourself, you just don’t use the 70-200 very much in proportion to a mid zoom say.
    Yep, hard to pass up the 24-105/4/IS if I would have bought that one first no telling if I would have even considered all the others I have. Wait, who am I kidding :p

    timsdds last blog post..My Canon EF 70-200 mm F4L USM & Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens, two of my other ‘children’

    Rate this:
    2.8

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv Enabled


Site Navigation

Now to him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you blameless before the presence of his glory with great joy, to the only God, our Savior, through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory, majesty, dominion, and authority, before all time and now and forever. Amen. (Jude 1:24-25, ESV)

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline